Frequently asked questions

Does it use its own repos

Only instantOS related packages are hosted in the instantOS custom repo, for everything else the Arch repos are used.

Does it support 32 bit

Yes, but the 32 bit version doesn’t have a live session yet so you’ll have to use the CLI installer

Raspberry Pi

There are some people working on an arm community edition. Development is happening on GitHub

Why is this a Distro not a DE

instantOS has an approach similar to elementary OS (apart from providing a different workflow) in that it’s technically a collection of custom software that can be run under any distro but actually doing so could require some extra steps. Being a Distro everything about the initial setup can be controlled and things are pretty much guaranteed to work properly. instantOS should be accessible to anyone with as little upfront effort as possible. It also gets you a near Arch experience under the hood, more so than Manjaro or Endeavour as the installer is compliant with the official install guide. This is ideal as a base system and previously not accessible to non-technical people.

Wayland

instantOS will eventually transition to Wayland but this will only happen once certain conditions are met. First off, hardware support needs to be on part or better than Xorg, namely nvidia needs to be working reliably and fast. There also needs to be feature parity between wayland and x11. Screen recording and screenshots must be stable and working. No OBS features or anything like that should be missing. It also won’t be among the first applicatios to adapt wayland. As long as 90% of GUIs still run in xwayland switching doesn’t make sense. Lastly, things need to be as stable as Xorg, instantOS won’t be an experimental example of what wayland can do, it’s meant as an actual operating system people can use, not a tech demo. I know that this sounds like a lot to ask but under no circumstances will the jump to wayland come with a worse user experience. Who cares if under the hood things are theoretically clean and modern if they don’t work?

“But I have been using wayland for years and it’s fine”

It might work for you but it’s far from working for everyone. To be a suitable replacement for Xorg that needs to be the case.

Can I change keybindings

Yes, but just know that you shouldn’t before learning the default bindings. You can clone the git repo of instantWM and edit config.def.h à la dwm. After that you can run the ./build.sh script to apply changes. If you have a general suggestion on how to improve bindings, opening an issue on GitHub is much appreciated. Patching instantWM is also problematic because you’ll manually have to apply updates and providing support for a copy with modified source code it difficult. A more traditional runtime config file for hotkeys is being worked on.

Calamares

instantOS used to use Calamares but switched to a custom installer called instantARCH for several reasons.

  • calamares has higher system requirements than the OS itself which would lock out a potential userbase.
  • Calamares only has official support for amd64 while instantARCH can easily be ported to any architecture.
  • Calamares also makes adding features to it quite complicated and is still quite limiting in that regard. instantARCH already lets you do things like choose kernel or extra packages, both of which would be difficult to do with Calamares.
  • instantARCH fits the system aesthetic a lot better while qt looks quite out of place
  • instantARCH can run as a cli off any up to date Arch iso

In the current state of development it is also important to be able to adjust the installation process without releasing a new iso every time. That is why instantARCH is netinstall only at the moment. An option to install without internet access will be added in the future.

Why is this not a Manjaro flavour

instantOS used to be based on Manjaro in the beginning, but switched to being based on pure Arch for a few reasons.

  • Manjaro uses Calamares which is not a good fit for instantOS, see the reasons above
  • forking a fork comes with a bunch of problems
    The Manjaro version had a bunch of issues like being laggy or not working on some systems, bad internet connectivity, installation issues etc. With how messy Manjaro development tools are it was hard to tell where the issues came from and at some point it was just becoming easier to switch to Arch which is what most people wanted anyway.
  • Arch is available for more architectures than manjaro. Manjaro 32 bit is unmaintained and the other versions are a mess. instantOS being a lightweight distro has a target audience on ARM and 32 bit, both of which can be served better on Arch. You can read more about the experience with Manjaro tools here
  • It does things different than Manjaro which lead to development basically fighting its bloaty base.
  • Most users want it to be based of Arch after beta 1
  • Arch can be trusted to be always there and maintained, Manjaro can’t as the recent drama, forums being set to read only and so on shows

YoUrE FrAgMeNtInG tHe LiNuX DeSkToP REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE, become a gnome contributor instead

Sorry if this one is getting a little defensive but the question is provocative and so is the answer. The question of why a distro should exist is an interesting one, so let me explain why I think instantOS doesn’t fall into the “30th fork of something that doesn’t contribute to the original but still breaks in different ways”-category. First of all, if you wanted to rid the earth of such projects, start with Zorin OS. It is Ubuntu Gnome with a custom gtk theme. That is not even exaggerated, if you take a look at their Github that’s the only thing you’ll find, among with a fork of kde connect that’s also just a rename. The amount of press Zorin has managed to gather with absolutely no substance is staggering. And no, I also think that we do not need yet another debian iso with kde or xfce preinstalled and a changed wallpaper. The reason why I created instantOS is that it didn’t exist before. It is unique and its experience is not offered by any other Distro and I suspect that won’t change. It’s amining to be lightweight, feature rich, power user friendly and still usable for people who are not experienced with standalone WMs. It has a GUI control center that is not dependant on any desktop environment, a hybrind WM, a noob friendly lightweight installer any many more things that offer a desktop experience that is unique. It also ticks the technical boxes that make it a distro like having its own repos.